<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the New Definition of &#8220;Rich&#8221; &#8211; 150,000 and Working its Way Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/29/more-on-the-new-definition-of-rich-150000-and-working-its-way-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/29/more-on-the-new-definition-of-rich-150000-and-working-its-way-down/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/29/more-on-the-new-definition-of-rich-150000-and-working-its-way-down/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustbutverify.wordpress.com/?p=932#comment-668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to figure out the reading comprehension flaw here. He says the tax breaks should go to middle class (150,000), not the rich (1.4 mil), as the stated examples. And then somehow they&#039;re the same thing.

Come again?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to figure out the reading comprehension flaw here. He says the tax breaks should go to middle class (150,000), not the rich (1.4 mil), as the stated examples. And then somehow they&#8217;re the same thing.</p>
<p>Come again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity Back &#171; Trust, But Verify</title>
		<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/29/more-on-the-new-definition-of-rich-150000-and-working-its-way-down/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity Back &#171; Trust, But Verify]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustbutverify.wordpress.com/?p=932#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But Verify     &#171; More on the New Definition of &#8220;Rich&#8221; - 150,000 and Working its Way&#160;Down    Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity&#160;Back October 29, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But Verify     &laquo; More on the New Definition of &#8220;Rich&#8221; &#8211; 150,000 and Working its Way&nbsp;Down    Obama is Bringing Sexlebrity&nbsp;Back October 29, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; More on the New Definition of “Rich” - 150000 and Working its Way Down Joe Biden On Best Political Blogs: News And Info On Joe Biden</title>
		<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/29/more-on-the-new-definition-of-rich-150000-and-working-its-way-down/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; More on the New Definition of “Rich” - 150000 and Working its Way Down Joe Biden On Best Political Blogs: News And Info On Joe Biden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustbutverify.wordpress.com/?p=932#comment-583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] - 150000 and Working its Way Down      Posted in October 29th, 2008  by admin in Uncategorized More on the New Definition of “Rich” - 150000 and Working its Way Down “Then, this weekend, he announced in an ad that if you’re a family making less than $200000 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; 150000 and Working its Way Down      Posted in October 29th, 2008  by admin in Uncategorized More on the New Definition of “Rich” &#8211; 150000 and Working its Way Down “Then, this weekend, he announced in an ad that if you’re a family making less than $200000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

