<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nebraska Backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/17/nebraska-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/17/nebraska-backlash/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratpacklaw</title>
		<link>http://trustreagan.com/2008/10/17/nebraska-backlash/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ratpacklaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trustbutverify.wordpress.com/?p=747#comment-487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just emailed him:

*************************
Dear Chancellor,

I trust that many applicants to your law school have filled the application and were required to fill in the “criminal/history” question affirmatively.  Many of them were thereby not granted admission b/c this factored into Nebraska Law’s decision making process.  

How can you justify turning them away, while inviting someone who bombed a federal judge’s home b/c of a ruling he made, to speak at your 100yr Anniversary?

Think about it.  

***********************]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just emailed him:</p>
<p>*************************<br />
Dear Chancellor,</p>
<p>I trust that many applicants to your law school have filled the application and were required to fill in the “criminal/history” question affirmatively.  Many of them were thereby not granted admission b/c this factored into Nebraska Law’s decision making process.  </p>
<p>How can you justify turning them away, while inviting someone who bombed a federal judge’s home b/c of a ruling he made, to speak at your 100yr Anniversary?</p>
<p>Think about it.  </p>
<p>***********************</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

